Legal Practitioners (Regulations and Maintenance of Standards in Professions, Protecting the Interest of Clients and Promoting the Rule of Law) Act

Undoubtedly, there is a need to check exploitation of litigants and clients by legal professionals including advocates and the State Bar Councils have not been able to check such exploitation. The existing law is adequate but implementation thereof is zero. The professional standards are deteriorating day by day. The working conditions available to most of the lawyers are pitiable. Many lawyers resort to short-cuts to become rich over-night. Socio-economic conditions are also responsible. The proposed law –‘Legal Practitioners (Regulations and Maintenance of Standards in Professions, Protecting the Interest of Clients and Promoting the Rule of Law) Act, 2010 is no a solution.

Draft of Protection of Women Against Sexual Harassment at Work-place Bill, 2010

Union Cabinet approval of the draft of Protection of Women Against Sexual Harassment at Work-place Bill, 2010 is little late but a great step. The proposed legislation provides a wide umbrella of justice to women who face sexual harassment at their workplace in public, private and unorganized sectors. The importance of any social legislation depends upon its effective implementation. The women labour particularly in unorganized sector is deprived of all basic human and fundamental rights.

RTE Act, 2009 discourages govt employees to send their wards to unaided schools - SJ writes to GOI to enforce S 8(a) & 9(a) of RTE Act, 2009

SOCIAL JURIST
A Civil Rights Group

To, 03.11.2010
The Secretary,
Govt. of India,
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions,
Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001


Sub:- Enforce Sections 8(a) and 9(a) of RTE Act, 2009 prohibiting govt. employees to claim reimbursement of school fees at elementary level

Dear Sir,

I invite your kind attention to Sections 8(a) and 9(a) of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE, Act 2009) which are reproduced as under:-

“8. Duties of appropriate Government.- The appropriate Government shall –
(a) provide free and compulsory elementary education to every child:

Provided that where a child is admitted by his or her parents or guardian, as the case may be, in a school other than a school established, owned, controlled or substantially financed by funds provided directly or indirectly by the appropriate Government or a local authority, such child or his or her parents or guardian, as the case may be, shall not be entitled to make a claim for reimbursement of expenditure incurred on elementary education of the child in such other school.

9. Duties of local authority.- Every local authority shall-
(a) Provide free and compulsory elementary education to every child.
Provided that where a child is admitted by his or her parents or guardian, as the case may be, in a school other than a school established, owned, controlled or substantially financed by funds provided directly or indirectly by the appropriate Government or a local authority, such child or his or her parents or guardian, as the case may be shall not be entitled to make a claim for reimbursement of expenditure incurred on elementary education of the child in such other school;”

You are well aware of the fact that the RTE Act, 2009 has come into force w.e.f. 01.04.2010. My understanding of the aforementioned provisions of the RTE Act, 2009 is that the parents or guardians, as case may be, w.e.f. 01.04.2010 are not entitled to claim re-imbursement of expenditure incurred by them on elementary education of their wards studying in unaided private schools. It would obviously include parents or guardians employed with Govt., Semi-Govt., Govt. Undertakings, Universities and Govt. Autonomous Institutions, etc. and sending their wards to the unaided private schools. The objective of the aforementioned provisions appears to discourage the government employees to send their wards to unaided private schools.

It has come to my notice that the employees employed with above said institutions and organizations and sending their wards to unaided private schools have been submitting their claims to the departments for re-imbursement of expenditure incurred by them on their wards studying in such schools and such claims are being sanctioned by the departments. It is submitted that such claims of the employees are in violation of the aforementioned provisions of the RTE Act, 2009.

You are, therefore, requested to kindly examine this matter and do the needful with intimation to the undersigned.

With regards,


Ashok Agarwal, Advocate
Advisor, Social Jurist
M-09811101923

SJ writes to DOE to enforce RTE Act, 2009 prohibiting govt. employees to claim reimbursement of school fees

To, 02.11.2010

The Director of Education,

Govt. of NCT of Delhi,

Old Secretariat Building,

Civil Lines, Delhi-110054

Sub:- RTE Act, 2009 prohibits govt. employees to claim re-imbursement of school fees at elementary level

Dear Sir,

I invite your kind attention to Sections 8(a) and 9(a) of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE, Act 2009) which are reproduced as under:-

“8. Duties of appropriate Government.- The appropriate Government shall –

(a) provide free and compulsory elementary education to every child:

Provided that where a child is admitted by his or her parents or guardian, as the case may be, in a school other than a school established, owned, controlled or substantially financed by funds provided directly or indirectly by the appropriate Government or a local authority, such child or his or her parents or guardian, as the case may be, shall not be entitled to make a claim for reimbursement of expenditure incurred on elementary education of the child in such other school.

9. Duties of local authority.- Every local authority shall-

(a) Provide free and compulsory elementary education to every child.

Provided that where a child is admitted by his or her parents or guardian, as the case may be, in a school other than a school established, owned, controlled or substantially financed by funds provided directly or indirectly by the appropriate Government or a local authority, such child or his or her parents or guardian, as the case may be shall not be entitled to make a claim for reimbursement of expenditure incurred on elementary education of the child in such other school;”

You are well aware of the fact that the RTE Act, 2009 has come into force w.e.f. 01.04.2010. My understanding of the aforementioned provisions of the RTE

Act, 2009 is that the parents or guardians, as case may be, w.e.f. 01.04.2010 are not entitled to claim re-imbursement of expenditure incurred by them on elementary education of their wards studying in unaided private schools. It would obviously include parents or guardians employed with you and sending their wards to the unaided private schools. The objective of the aforementioned provisions appears to discourage the government employees to send their wards to unaided private schools.

It has come to my notice that the employees employed with you and sending their wards to unaided private schools have been submitting their claims to the department for re-imbursement of expenditure incurred by them on their wards studying in such schools and such claims are being sanctioned by your department. The HOS of your schools are not aware of these provisions of law. It is submitted that such claims of the employees are in violation of the aforementioned provisions of the RTE Act, 2009.

You are, therefore, requested to kindly examine this matter and do the needful with intimation to the undersigned.

With regards,

Ashok Agarwal, Advocate

Advisor, Social Jurist

M-09811101923